Not What I Am: Discussion

If you haven't read Not What I Am yet, you might want to do that before reading further.

There are no author's notes yet.

Approximate readability: 2.82 (93 characters, 24 words, 2 sentences, 3.88 characters per word, 12.00 words per sentence)

Did you like this story? Consider pledging a few $$$ on Patreon so I can keep putting cool things online for free. Posted July 24, 2016 · Last updated April 4, 2018 · Permalink for Not What I Am: Discussion

Comments

LearnHexadecimal · October 7, 2011 · Permalink · Reply

1. Do you want to be notified of typos?

2. That was a very well-written story. I'm not sure if I can say I enjoyed reading it, but I feel like it communicated itself to me clearly.

Eli Dupree · October 7, 2011 · Permalink · Reply

1. Yes; typos are bad and I would like to be able to correct them.

2. Why thank you!

LearnHexadecimal · October 7, 2011 · Permalink · Reply

There's a typo in “psychological” in the warning on part 17 of the warnings version. I think it was “psyhological”? *checks* Yes.

Eli Dupree · October 7, 2011 · Permalink · Reply

Ha ha, how careless of me! I was expecting you to point out a typo in the story itself. :-) Anyway, should be fixed now.

LearnHexadecimal · October 7, 2011 · Permalink · Reply

If I find one of those on a reread I will tell you about it too!

momothefiddler · October 8, 2011 · Permalink · Reply

Good job! I liked it. It made me (and is still making me) think and feel. I like that there is a primary conflict without, as far as I can tell, a good side and bad side. The story makes me realise that I'm very used to summarizing situations in a binary sense based on who was right and who was wrong, because my initial response was “Who was at fault?” but, I think, this realisation has allowed me to start working on that.

Thanks.