Transcript: (hide)(show)

Past Harry stands outside Hagrid's hut, facing away from it.
PRESENT HARRY: I should have destroyed that hut. I should have burnt it to the ground! that place where one man's good name is more important than ten years of abuse! { pause } I was too weak. { pause } Instead, I ran and hid, in an unused room I'd found where there as a strange mirror that reflected everything except for me.

Past Harry stands in a dark room, facing a tall, ornate, tinted mirror. There is an unreadable inscription on its frame. There's a table nearby, which is reflected in the mirror. Harry is touching the mirror with two fingers, but those fingers are not reflected.

PRESENT HARRY: And then...

DUMBLEDORE'S VOICE { from off-page }: Ah, Harry, I thought I might find you here.

PAST HARRY: You!!!

(hide transcript)

Usually, if a character destroyed a building in a fit of rage, we'd consider that to be a character flaw. Here, Harry considers the fact that ze didn't do that to be a character flaw!

If a character does something that you think is a bad idea, but they disagree and think it was fine, then it's not “a character flaw”, it's just “somebody doing something you don't like”.

I personally don't find the concept of “character flaws” to be a useful concept, in general. Categorizing people's attributes into “good” and “bad” is an oversimplification that doesn't really help me understand either the attributes or the people. I sometimes simplify things when I'm trying to decide what to do in real life, but when I'm building a story, the important thing to do is to understand deeply.

Approximate readability: 10.96 (610 characters, 137 words, 6 sentences, 4.45 characters per word, 22.83 words per sentence)